Friday, March 18, 2005

Right to Life of Incapcitated Persons - a Move to US District Courts

Terri Shiavo a Vegetable -- No
US HB 3060 "Protection of Incapcitated Persons Act of 2005"



A recent call for action was received today regarding Terri Shiavo, see below:

Kathryn,

With the court-ordered starvation of Terri Schiavo scheduled to
begin tomorrow (Friday 3/18), we are sending you this urgent
update asking you to take action immediately.

Last night, a bill passed the U.S. House (H.R. 1332) that would
allow Terri's case to be moved from state court to federal court.
This would save Terri from tomorrow's court-ordered starvation.

Today, the Senate is taking up the measure.

+ + Action #1: Call Your Two Texas Senators Now!


Our contacts on Capitol Hill are asking us to rally thousands of
calls to the Senate, urging the Senate to take up the IDENTICAL
bill that passed the House (H.R. 1332) and pass it TODAY!

Your Texas Senators:
Sen. Cornyn: 202/224-2934
Sen. Hutchison: (202) 224-5922

You can also call the Switchboard and request to speak
to your Senator: 202-224-3121.

+ + TALKING POINTS


-- Tell them that you are part of the Grassfire team!
-- Urge your Senator to take action today to "Save Terri Schiavo"
-- Urge your Senators to support an IDENTICAL bill to
H.R. 1332 that passed the House last night.

+ + Action #2: Help Us Rally 1 Million People Today!



Thank you for having a real impact today!

CWL Database Abandoned?

House OKs hiding Names of Gun Permit Holders: Public should not be able to find out who might be carrying concealed

Not too sure if I truly agree with this one. As one that does verifications of employment for a security company, it is interesting to be able to reach into this database to verify that their application has true information. Perhaps, what should really happen is a limitation of access of the database?????

I am hoping that, due to my line of business, this bill doesn't pass, even though the House has put their stamp of approval on it.

Thursday, March 17, 2005

MEDICAID - Partial Victory in Texas

YES!!! Finally, a small victory...even if it is only victory in one side of the Texas House. Hopefully, this will hold true and prevail through the other half of the house after their Easter Break. Continued support and fight for the much needed Medicaid reform vs Medicaid cuts is needed more than ever to ensure passability through both houses.

Here is what I received in today's email bag:



Senate Rejects Proposed Medicaid Cuts
NAMI eNews March 17, 2005

By a bipartisan vote of 52-48, the Senate today stripped a proposal to require $15 billion in cuts to the Medicaid program over the next five years. The vote came on an amendment to the FY 2006 budget resolution authored by Senators Gordon Smith (R-OR) and Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) to remove the proposed cuts to Medicaid and replace them with a commission to examine long-term reforms to the program.

NAMI strongly supported the Smith-Bingaman Amendment and is extremely grateful to the 52 Senators that voted for it today. In particular, NAMI appreciates the support of Senators who crossed party lines to oppose cuts to Medicaid: Chafee (RI), Coleman (MN), Collins (ME), DeWine (OH), Smith (OR), Snowe (ME), and Specter (PA). NAMI advocates are strongly encouraged to contact their Senators
who supported the Smith-Bingaman Amendment.

$20 Billion in Medicaid Cuts Remain in House Budget Resolution

While the Senate is now on record against cuts in Medicaid, the House budget resolution -- which cleared the House this afternoon by a 218-214 margin -- still contains a requirement for $20 billion in cuts to Medicaid over the next five years. When Congress returns from its upcoming Easter recess on April 4, a House-Senate Conference Committee will reconcile differences between the separate proposals. It is expected that pressure will be brought from the White House and House and Senate leaders to restore the cuts to Medicaid that were stripped by the Senate today. Thus strong grassroots pressure during the coming Easter recess will be critically important to keeping Medicaid cuts out of the final budget resolution.

ACTION REQUIRED

Starting March 21, Congress will be on a two-week "district work period" during which members will be in their states and districts meeting with constituents, holding town meetings and appearing on local radio call-in programs. NAMI advocates (and proponents for the Medicaid program survival) are encouraged to reach out to Senators and House members through phone calls, e-mails and personal visits to express support for the Smith-Bingaman Amendment to keep Medicaid cuts out of the FY 2006 budget resolution.

Remind members of the Congress that:

* Medicaid is the largest source of funding for the public mental health system in every state - especially optional services each state Medicaid program offers to mandatory beneficiaries (particularly individuals eligible for SSI). These optional services include prescription drugs, case management and assertive community treatment.

* The growth in Medicaid spending in recent years is driven by overall health care costs in the economy - NOT by the demands of program beneficiaries with severe disabilities and chronic illnesses who rely on Medicaid as a safety net. In fact, Medicaid growth is actually below that for insurance premiums in the private sector.

* The burden for deficit reduction should not fall hardest on the most vulnerable and disabled - including children and adults with severe mental illnesses.

* A bipartisan Medicaid commission will ensure that efforts to reform the program and restrain future spending are based on established principles and goals for reforms, NOT an arbitrary budget target.

All congressional offices can be reached by calling toll-free 1-800-828-0498.

For additional information, Smith-Bingaman Amendment.

Friday, March 11, 2005

Pedophiliacs Beware!

They're not clothes-minded: Austin nudists enjoy nature, unfettered recreation in the Texas Hill Country

This The Daily Texan - Online article bares all about the nudist world -- especially about Austin's own Hippie Hollow, which has been a legend in Austin since way before the 70's when I was going to college at The University of Texas.

Besides mentioning, too, the nudist's organizations:

* The American Association for Nude Recreation
* The Naturist Action Committee
* The Hill Country Nudists

they also refer to HB 772 which proposes to prohibit youth nudist camps from forming. Rumor has it that a 2003 article in the New York Times propogated that there just might be a youth nudist camp forming by 2005. To this date, no such camp has actually formed, but House Representative Hughes signed the initial bill proposal in order to ensure that no such camps are formed, in hopes of preventing it from becoming a haven for pedophiles. This is a grave concern in Texas where pedophiles tend to run rampant enough to cause a deep-rooted concern.

In 2002, for example, the FBI had a sting operation called Operation Candyman which arrested over 89 folks, including (I believe 5) in the Houston area, connected with a child pornography ring. Therefore, as silly as HB 772 may sound, there is a connection for the concern. While nudists do their own thing, at their own place and time, and to each his own, I personally do not care what the adult nudists do, but they do need to protect their children from criminalistic behavior and activities. The fact that the Ausitn group doesn't run background checks, other than checking for banning from other nudist groups, is a bit alarming; however, they will be the ones greatest affected by their inaction because it will be their children, as a rule. Perhaps, some presure to the Austin group should be had, to improve their background checks to help eliminate a means for a pedophile to get into their club and, in the end, protect their children who also attend these nudists events. Apparently, this is Texas House Representative Hughes' concern as well.

The old addage: an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure would seem very appropriate here.

Wednesday, March 09, 2005

Both Sides of House - Presenting Similar MH Bills

House Republican, Democrat file similar mental-health bills

You would certainly have to chuckle as reading this article from The Daily Texan - Online as this seems to exude the thought that perhaps, if both sides of the house agree that something needs to be done so much to the extent that they have created very similar bills, this bill should pass. What a novel thought!!

What happens though often times, these type of bills don't pass, simply because then it becomes a battle of the wits to see whose bill will eventually "win out" having more of what they have said and deemed important aspect of that bill to be threaded into the final bill. What they will have to do is set aside differences and each side agree to disagree, unless a viable third alternative can resolve the disagreed area point of prospective law, in order to get the bill passed into law. Apparently, though, they aren't too off-based from each other so there is that chance that the bills might be passed into a law that will become effective soon.

These particular bills include various parities in mental health coverages offered (or currently lack of being offered) by many insurance providers and their policies. Medical bills incurred by mental health consumers and/or their caregivers find themselves being priced out of being able to provide appropriate health care because of their inaffordability. Insurance providers not only outprice the affordability for the end users to provide health care to the end users' selves and/or their families, but also have made it next to impossible for many small businesses to care for their employees by offering them the healtcare benefits.

Perhaps, these bills from both sides of the house, will not only look at the parities of the mental health coverages by the providers, but will also make it more affordable to small businesses to offer such benefits and programs, as well as making it more affordable to the mental health consumer and their caregivers.

This is something that certainly should be put on the future watch list as the legislators remain in session!

Tuesday, March 01, 2005

Eating disorder treatments paid for by insurance?

Lawmakers working on a bill for insurance to pay for eating disorders!

It is certainly high time that they consider this payment as many, many teens, etc. suffer from this disorder and they are breaking their parent's and/or caregiver's pocketbook in trying to find the cure. Some caregivers/parents are opting for counseling due to pocketbook issues; however, counseling alone is not the full cure for the eating disorder diagnosis. A great degree of the diagnosis is medically related -- and becomes a seriously medical condition, if left untreated.

Insurance companies, it would seem, would want to nip the disorder in the bud (so-to-speak) at the earliest point of intervention to avoid the extremely high costs of treating the eating disorders after the fact. Not a lot of people, and insurance companies, think the preventative medicine route; but, more should because it reduces the high costs of medical care in the end.

Eating disorders don't affect just teens though -- it hits all spectrums of life -- and can start to trigger some more serious diseases as well.

Hopefully, when it comes to reforming the health care in Texas, they will put their thinking caps on and consider preventative medicine as well as part of the big picture solution. In the meantime, it would be a huge step for insurance companies to consider paying for the eating disorders care and treatment!

So much of my blogs are law related...

So, I thought it was high time that I start a new Blog Sheet. This time, it refers to legislation passing, being considered, or fighting to be heard over topics that should be a law. This may entail coffee shop conversations that I have with folks, too, that bring up other areas of interest wherein there should be consideration of a law.

Look forward to reading your comments in the years to come. :)

Kathryn